<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Replacement for SmartFTP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timwadesblog.com/2008/08/24/replacement-for-smartftp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timwadesblog.com/2008/08/24/replacement-for-smartftp/</link>
	<description>Surfing, Snowboarding &#38; Beautiful Girls</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 20:35:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Wade</title>
		<link>http://timwadesblog.com/2008/08/24/replacement-for-smartftp/comment-page-1/#comment-790</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Wade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timwadesblog.com/?p=92#comment-790</guid>
		<description>Jim, SmartFTP can hardly be described as &quot;THE BEST&quot; - it does nothing the others don&#039;t, and nothing that cannot be done in FileZilla or at a DOS Command Prompt.

Let face it FTP programs just login to web servers and transfer files on TCP/IP port 21, and chmod files - ALL OF THEM DO THAT including FileZilla, CuteFTP or the thousands of other alternatives.

Hence your charge has lost me - a career long user of SmartFTP.

End of argument - my blog turning up in the search engines, offering alternatives for your product (that you revoked my use of) has definitely lost you custom to FileZilla (you&#039;d be surprised just how many I estimate from my web stats). Hence you are trying to justify your charge, and dump links on my blog (which you&#039;ll notice I haven&#039;t removed).

But let&#039;s face it FREE Filezilla at http://filezilla-project.org verses your $29 comparible product - WHAT DOES THE GUY AT NO1 IN GOOGLE FOR &quot;TIM INTERNET&quot; (BEATING TWO NATIONAL PHONE COMPANYS&#039; OF THE SAME NAME, AND THE TIM THAT INVENTED THE INTERNET USE - HE USES FILEZILLA).

Nuff said!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim, SmartFTP can hardly be described as &#8220;THE BEST&#8221; &#8211; it does nothing the others don&#8217;t, and nothing that cannot be done in FileZilla or at a DOS Command Prompt.</p>
<p>Let face it FTP programs just login to web servers and transfer files on TCP/IP port 21, and chmod files &#8211; ALL OF THEM DO THAT including FileZilla, CuteFTP or the thousands of other alternatives.</p>
<p>Hence your charge has lost me &#8211; a career long user of SmartFTP.</p>
<p>End of argument &#8211; my blog turning up in the search engines, offering alternatives for your product (that you revoked my use of) has definitely lost you custom to FileZilla (you&#8217;d be surprised just how many I estimate from my web stats). Hence you are trying to justify your charge, and dump links on my blog (which you&#8217;ll notice I haven&#8217;t removed).</p>
<p>But let&#8217;s face it FREE Filezilla at <a href="http://filezilla-project.org" rel="nofollow">http://filezilla-project.org</a> verses your $29 comparible product &#8211; WHAT DOES THE GUY AT NO1 IN GOOGLE FOR &#8220;TIM INTERNET&#8221; (BEATING TWO NATIONAL PHONE COMPANYS&#8217; OF THE SAME NAME, AND THE TIM THAT INVENTED THE INTERNET USE &#8211; HE USES FILEZILLA).</p>
<p>Nuff said!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://timwadesblog.com/2008/08/24/replacement-for-smartftp/comment-page-1/#comment-789</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timwadesblog.com/?p=92#comment-789</guid>
		<description>Well, SmartFTP is still the best and their product is much cheaper than what the competitors are offering. They have been basically given a 50 USD product away for free for years. I&#039;m happy to support them with my purchase. They also continue to improve the product. Look at the changelog at: http://www.smartftp.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, SmartFTP is still the best and their product is much cheaper than what the competitors are offering. They have been basically given a 50 USD product away for free for years. I&#8217;m happy to support them with my purchase. They also continue to improve the product. Look at the changelog at: <a href="http://www.smartftp.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.smartftp.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trey</title>
		<link>http://timwadesblog.com/2008/08/24/replacement-for-smartftp/comment-page-1/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>Trey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 18:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timwadesblog.com/?p=92#comment-111</guid>
		<description>Thank you, I tried filezilla a few years ago and it was far behind smartftp, however smartftp going from $0 to $36 is insane. Maybe a $5 donation or something but $36??? I will try filezilla again and hope they have some of those old bugs ironed out and I will never pay for smartftp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, I tried filezilla a few years ago and it was far behind smartftp, however smartftp going from $0 to $36 is insane. Maybe a $5 donation or something but $36??? I will try filezilla again and hope they have some of those old bugs ironed out and I will never pay for smartftp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

