Archive for the ‘Bloody officials’ Category

Politically correct (PC) “Merry Christmas” to everyone!

Thursday, December 22nd, 2011
share save 256 24 Politically correct (PC) Merry Christmas to everyone!
Good morning/afternoon/evening,

I wanted to send some sort of holiday greeting to friends and family, but it is difficult in today’s world to know exactly what to say without offending someone. So I met with my lawyer yesterday, and on advice I wish to say the following :

Please accept, with no obligation, implied or implicit, my best wishes for an environmentally conscious, socially responsible, low stress , non-addictive, gender neutral celebration of the winter solstice holiday practiced with the most enjoyable traditions of religious persuasion or secular practices of your choice with respect for the religious / secular persuasions and / or traditions of others, or their choice not to practice religious or secular traditions at all .

I also wish you a fiscally successful, personally fulfilling and medically uncomplicated recognition of the onset of the generally accepted calendar year 2012, but not without due respect for the calendar of choice of other cultures whose contributions to society have helped make our country great ( not to imply that the United Kingdom is necessarily greater than any other country ) and without regard to the race, creed, colour, age, physical ability, religious faith or sexual preference of the wishee .

By accepting this greeting, please be advised that you are accepting these terms :

This greeting is subject to clarification or withdrawal. It is freely transferable on the proviso that there is no alteration to the original greeting. It implies no promise by the wisher to actually implement any of the wishes for her / him or others and is void where prohibited by law, and is revocable at the sole discretion of the wisher. The wish is warranted to perform as expected within the usual application of good tidings for a period of one year or until the issuance of a new wish at the sole discretion of the wisher .

Best Regards ( without prejudice )

Name withheld ( Privacy Act )

Pat Condell speaks about the London Riots 2011, UK – Godless Comedy

Sunday, August 14th, 2011
share save 256 24 Pat Condell speaks about the London Riots 2011, UK   Godless Comedy

Pat Condell speaks about the London Riots 2011, UK – Godless Comedy. If there is one thing I love about Pat Condell, it’s his “I don’t give a toss” attitude to speaking the truth, with total ridicule of any government/organisation he’s taking the piss out of. Totally dry, totally sarcastic. Excellent.

Check out his lastest video on the London riots of 2011 in the UK:

You can keep up to date with Pat Condell’s Blog and his “humour” on his blog
!

How many zeros in a billion?

Tuesday, March 9th, 2010
share save 256 24 How many zeros in a billion?

This is too true to be funny.

The  next time you hear a politician use the
Word ‘billion’ in a casual  manner, think about
Whether you want the ‘politicians’  spending
YOUR tax money.

A billion is a difficult number to  comprehend,
But one advertising agency did a good job of
Putting  that figure into some perspective in
One of it’s  releases.

A.
A  billion seconds ago it was 1959.

B.
A  billion minutes ago Jesus was alive.

C.
A  billion hours ago our ancestors were
Living in the Stone  Age.

D.
A  billion days ago no-one walked on the earth on two feet.

E.
A  billion Pounds ago was only
13 hours and 12 minutes,
At  the rate our government
Is spending it.

Building  Permit Tax
Cigarette Tax
Value Added Tax
Corporate  Income Tax
Income Tax
Fishing License  Tax
Food License Tax
Fuel Permit Tax
Petrol/Diesel  Tax
Inheritance Tax
Inventory  Tax
(tax on top of tax)
Alcohol Tax
Luxury Tax
Marriage  License Tax
Property Tax
Stamp Duty Tax
Service charge taxes
Social Security Tax
Road  Tax 
   Local  Tax
Vehicle License Registration Tax
Vehicle Sales  Tax 
Workers Compensation Tax

STILL  THINK THIS IS FUNNY?

Not  one of these taxes existed 100 years ago…
And our nation was one of the most  prosperous in the world.

We had absolutely no national  debt…
We had the largest middle class in the world…
And  Mum stayed home to raise the kids.

What  happened?
Can you spell ‘politicians!’

I  hope this goes around the
UK
At least  100 times

What  the hell happened?????
Gordon Brown !!!

 How many zeros in a billion?

WE WAS BRUNG UP PROPER !!

Tuesday, March 9th, 2010
share save 256 24 WE WAS BRUNG UP PROPER !!

WE WAS BRUNG UP PROPER !!

“And we never had a whole Mars bar until 1993″!!!
CONGRATULATIONS TO ALL  FRIENDS  & RELATIONS WHO WERE BORN IN THE 1940′s, 50′s, 60′s and 70′s !
First, we survived being born to mothers who smoked and/or drank while they carried us and lived in houses made of asbestos…
They took aspirin, ate blue cheese, raw egg products, loads of bacon and processed meat, tuna from a can, and didn’t get tested for diabetes or cervical cancer.
Then after that trauma, our baby cots were covered with bright coloured lead-based paints.

We had no childproof lids on medicine bottles, doors or cabinets and when we rode our bikes, we had no helmets or shoes, not to mention, the risks we took hitchhiking.
As children, we would ride in cars with no seat belts or air bags.
We drank water from the garden hose and NOT from a bottle.
Take away food was limited to fish and chips, no pizza shops, McDonalds , KFC, Subway or Nandos.
Even though all the shops closed at 6.00pm and didn’t open on a Sunday, somehow we didn’t starve to death!
We shared one soft drink with four friends, from one bottle and NO ONE actually died from this.
We could collect old drink bottles and cash them in at the corner store and buy Toffees, Gobstoppers, Bubble Gum and some bangers to blow up frogs with.
We ate cupcakes, white bread and real butter and drank soft drinks with sugar in it, but we weren’t overweight because……
WE WERE ALWAYS OUTSIDE PLAYING!!
We would leave home in the morning and play all day, as long as we were back when the streetlights came on.
No one was able to reach us all day. And we were O..K.
We would spend hours building our go-carts out of old prams and then ride down the hill, only to find out we forgot the brakes. We built tree houses and dens and played in river beds with matchbox cars.
We did not have Playstations, Nintendo Wii , X-boxes, no video games at all, no 999 channels on SKY ,
no video/dvd films,
no mobile phones, no personal computers, no Internet or Internet chat rooms……….WE HAD FRIENDS and we went outside and found them!

We fell out of trees, got cut, broke bones and teeth and there were no
Lawsuits from these accidents.

Only girls had pierced ears!

We ate worms and mud pies made from dirt, and the worms did not live in us forever.

You could only buy Easter Eggs and Hot Cross Buns at Easter time…

We were given air guns and catapults for our 10th birthdays,

We rode bikes or walked to a friend’s house and knocked on the door or rang the bell, or just yelled for them!
Mum didn’t have to go to work to help dad make ends meet because we didn’t need to keep up with the Jones’s!

Not everyone made the rugby/football/cricket/netball team. Those who didn’t had to learn to deal with disappointment. Imagine that!! Getting into the team was based on
MERIT

Our teachers used to hit us with canes and gym shoes and throw the blackboard rubber at us if they thought we weren’t concentrating .
We can string sentences together and spell and have proper conversations because of a good, solid three R’s education.
Our parents would tell us to ask a stranger to help us cross the road.
The idea of a parent bailing us out if we broke the law was unheard of.
They actually sided with the law!

Our parents didn’t invent stupid names for their kids like ‘Kiora’ and ‘Blade’ and ‘Ridge’ and ‘Vanilla’

We had freedom, failure, success and responsibility, and we learned HOW TO
DEAL WITH IT ALL !

And YOU are one of them!
CONGRATULATIONS!
You might want to share this with others who have had the luck to grow up as kids, before the lawyers and the government regulated our lives for our own good.
And while you are at it, forward it to your kids so they will know how brave their parents were.

 WE WAS BRUNG UP PROPER !!

Police brutality and BBC negligence

Sunday, August 16th, 2009
share save 256 24 Police brutality and BBC negligence
On the 1st April, several thousand peaceful demonstrators formed a camp
outside the European Climate Exchange on Bishopsgate in central London. Despite
assurances by Commander Broadhurst that the peaceful intentions of the campers
were recognized, the camp was violently attacked and shut down in the early
hours of Thursday morning by the police. The timing of this was enormously suspicious; although we cannot move beyond conjecture, the fact that this was
too late for the papers to report, and after the news broadcasters had stopped reporting, suggests that the police waited for a time to act which would fall
between the cracks of public awareness.

The Climate Camp was not affiliated with the G20 meltdown protests outside the Bank of England, and was not, as has been suggested, an eclectic
association of “confused anarchists”. It was a coalition of people with one clear agenda; highlighting the deficiencies of the industrial worlds response to
climate change, specifically the failure of the Carbon Trading scheme. It is not possible to claim that the camp was the victim of the provocation of
“violent anarchists”; there were none. There is not a single report of violence by the Bishopsgate protestors, whilst a wealth of evidence exists to prove the
extreme brutality of the police tactics to remove the camp. Our intention is narrow in focus; rather than protesting against the numerous injustices
perpetrated against the innocent throughout the day, we want your help in challenging the institution responsible for this whitewash- the BBC.

To give an impression of police tactics, these are some of the things personally experienced and observed;

With no warning, riot police charged the camp, beating and pushing peaceful protesters who had their palms up as a symbol of their peaceful intentions.
When people were knocked down, protesters who went to help were hit with shields and attacked with batons.
When people sat down to try and prevent the police from charging, they were kicked in the chins and beaten (some for long periods of time whilst lying helpless).
The police hauled people out and dragged them around, bending their arms back and threatening totally peaceful protesters.
Some riot police lost control and began hitting everything in sight, including fellow police officers and innocent protesters. On mass, the police removed their identification, preventing us from pursuing any avenues of complaint.

This sounds horrendous, and immensely unlikely but we cannot emphasise enough that it is fact.

The BBC is supposed to be an institution that reports important issues and does so impartially. This usually includes reporting from a variety of perspectives
and ensuring that breaking news of something as significant as police attacking entirely peaceful protesters, gets through. Unfortunately, none of this has
been reported by the BBC; their website was not updated past 9.30 pm on Wednesday, which is exactly when innocent people were being subject to police
brutality. BBC News 24 supposedly provides round the clock coverage of current news, but they did not mention the atrocious behaviour of the police towards
the climate campers. To us, this seems completely inexcusable; the BBC has essentially blanked the issue and has not portrayed the true nature of the
protests or the police tactics.

If you agree with us, and believe that the BBC has failed on this matter, please please fill out a complaints form which can be found here:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/complaints/complaints_stage1.shtml

Your complaint can be as simple as “I don’t think that the BBC provided adequate coverage of the police tactics used on peaceful protesters at the G20
Climate Camp”, or it can be more extensive.

If we get enough people to do this, then it will become a headline in itself and the BBC will be forced to say why it did not think that the attacking of peaceful citizens was not newsworthy and did not warrant attention. What’s
more, we may be able to hold the police to account.

Please invite all your friends to join.
Thank you for taking the time to make a small difference.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/complaints/complaints_stage1.shtml

***UPDATE***
The issues raised here two weeks ago have finally come to light. Thank you to all who have helped made a difference.
Please join the campaign to prevent a reoccurence of the brutality of April 1st.
http://www.defendpeacefulprotest.org/
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=60467068334
The last couple of weeks have been a beautiful testament to the power of common people united in their outrage.

 Police brutality and BBC negligence

HOW THE TAX SYSTEM WORKS

Friday, April 24th, 2009
share save 256 24 HOW THE TAX SYSTEM WORKS

Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to £100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:

The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing. The fifth would pay £1.The sixth would pay £3.The seventh would pay £7.The eighth would pay £12.The ninth would pay £18.The tenth man (the richest) would pay £59. So, that’s what they decided to do. The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve. ‘Since you are all such good customers,’ he said, ‘I’m going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by £20.’ Drinks for the ten now cost just £80.

The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes so the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free. But what about the other six men – the paying customers? How could they divide the £20 windfall so that everyone would get his ‘fair share?’ They realized that £20 divided by six is £3.33. But if they subtracted that from everyone’s share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer. So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man’s bill by roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay. And so: The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings).The sixth now paid £2 instead of £3 (33%savings).The seventh now pay £5 instead of £7 (28%savings).The eighth now paid £9 instead of £12 (25% savings).The ninth now paid £14 instead of £18 (22% savings).The tenth now paid £49 instead of £59 (16% savings). Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to drink for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings. ‘I only got a pound out of the £20,’ declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man, ‘but he got £10!’ ‘Yes, that’s right,’ exclaimed the fifth man. ‘I only saved a pound, too. It’s unfair that he got ten times more than I did’ ‘That’s true!!’ shouted the seventh man. ‘Why should he get £10 back when I got only two? The wealthy get all the breaks’ ‘Wait a minute,’ yelled the first four men in unison. ‘We didn’t get anything at all. The system exploits the poor’ The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

The next night the tenth man didn’t show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn’t have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill. And that, ladies and gentlemen, journalists and college professors, is how our tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.

For those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible

 HOW THE TAX SYSTEM WORKS

60th Nato summit in Strasbourg

Wednesday, April 1st, 2009
share save 256 24 60th Nato summit in Strasbourg

28 heads of States are expected in Strasbourg, Kehl and Baden-Baden in April 3rd an 4th.

25 000 policemen will be deployed on both sides of the river Rhine in one of the biggest security operation ever organized in France.

Between 35 000 and 40 000 demonstrators will gather during the summit. A counter-summit is organized in Neuhof in the extreme south of Strasbourg.

 60th Nato summit in Strasbourg

An email from Steven Katirai calling for the resignation of Gordon Brown

Thursday, February 26th, 2009
share save 256 24 An email from Steven Katirai calling for the resignation of Gordon Brown

Here follows a masterpiece calling for the resignation of Gordon Brown. Please feel free to read, link to and distribute as you see fit. Well done Steven for putting so many peoples thoughts at forefront of mind:

S T E V E N K A T I R A I
B E L L A M O U R , L O N G H O R S L E Y , M O R P E T H ,
N O R T H U M B E R L A N D N E 6 5 8 R B
e – m a i l – S t e v e n @ k a t i r a i . c o m
The Right Honourable
Gordon Brown MP
10 Downing Street,
London
SW1A 2AA
Sunday, 15 February 2009
Prime Minister
An open letter demanding your resignation.
Your position is untenable and, I as a citizen of Great Briton demand your
instant resignation.
You are unelected, have no popular mandate and lack the moral authority
to be Prime Minister. Your terms as Chancellor and Prime Minister have
been a total disaster for this nation and your attempt to cling on to power
at all costs show a complete contempt for this nation and displays your
absolute vanity and thirst for political power.
I list below some of the mistakes made by you during your time in public
office. If as a director of a limited company you had made similar mistakes
you would be subject to criminal prosecution and banned from being a
company director. As a Government minister the standards exercised
should be significantly higher than those exercised by a company director,
you have failed to maintain those standards and are unfit for public office.
? Banking Supervision: You transferred responsibility for banking
supervision to the Financial Services Authority from the Bank of
England so directly laying the seeds of the current banking crisis.
? Banking Crisis: The initial response to the Northern Rock crisis was so
slow as to be glacial and ultimately led to the damage done to the
whole banking sector. A strong Prime Minister would have provided
depositors with a guarantee that their deposits were safe and the
S T E V E N K A T I R A I
B E L L A M O U R , L O N G H O R S L E Y , M O R P E T H ,
N O R T H U M B E R L A N D N E 6 5 8 R B
e – m a i l – S t e v e n @ k a t i r a i . c o m
bank run would have stopped. Ultimately the same guarantee would
have ensured that the HBOS and RBS debacle would not have been
so severe.
? Criminal Negligence: The entire UK banking crisis has been caused by
a lack of supervision under the regulatory regime set up by you, any
man of honour would have resigned upon seeing the damage caused.
You however have tried to blame everyone else and accept no
responsibility. You are criminally negligent.
? Vanity: You have used the banking crisis to attempt to advance your
personal standing and political career at the expense of the nation.
? Lack of Judgment: You have made three serious errors of judgment
in your appointment of advisers on the current financial crisis.
1. Your choice of banker to compile a report on ideas for improving
public health was Sir Derek Wanless. a Northern Rock director when
it imploded in 2007.
2. You appointed Sir James Crosby, the former HBOS CEO, to the board
of the FSA who then had to resign after becoming embroiled in the
row over failings of risk management at HBOS.
3. It now also appears that Glen Moreno will be forced out of his job, as
chairman of UK Financial Investments Ltd, the company set up to
oversee the government’s stake in the bailed-out banks, because of
his links with a Liechtenstein trust accused of tax evasion.
? You Fantasize: By clinging to the idea that, thanks to your genius British
citizens are far better placed than competitors to handle this crisis. The
following two facts demonstrate that this is a fantasy:-
1. The Office for National Statistics’ revelation that while the number of
foreign workers getting jobs in the UK continues to grow (up by
175,000 to 2.4 million last year), domestic unemployment is rising
sharply.
2. According to Business Monitor International, a research company
specialising in country risk, “Britain is facing an unprecedented fall in
its economic world ranking… from 12th place in 2007 to 21st in
S T E V E N K A T I R A I
B E L L A M O U R , L O N G H O R S L E Y , M O R P E T H ,
N O R T H U M B E R L A N D N E 6 5 8 R B
e – m a i l – S t e v e n @ k a t i r a i . c o m
2010″. “Despite enjoying 11 years of growth between 1997 and
2007, the UK ran a budget deficit of 1.7 per cent of GDP over this
period, fuelling a fiscal time bomb. Faced with the financial burden of
bailing out the banking sector and kick-starting the economy, the
budget deficit will swell to an unsustainable 9.3 per cent of GDP in
2009.”
? Public spending: Your 2000 Spending Review presaged a major
expansion of government spending, without any significant benefit to
public services, directly leading to the UK being in the worst shape of
any industrialised nation to weather the current financial crisis.
? You have colluded in hiding the full extent of public borrowing by using
PFI initiatives to hide the borrowings off balance sheet. PFI is the most
expensive and inefficient form of finance possible, and you have
saddled the country with a debt that you cannot even quantify. Jeremy
Pocklington, leader of the Treasury’s corporate and private finance
team, could only give a rough estimate to Richard Bacon that the total
liabilities, but not debt, from the vast majority of PFIs, but not all, from
2006-07 to 2032-33, but not beyond, is £157.9bn. That is not only
astounding but unbelievable.
? Public sector Employment: The office for national Statistics shows
Public sector employment was 5,846,000 (20.4 per cent of all in
employment) in June 2005, 680,000 (13.2 per cent) higher than in June
1998, whereas from 1998 to 2005 private sector employment only rose
by 1,241,000 (5.7 per cent). This growth is unsustainable and wrong.
? Growth: An OECD report shows UK economic growth averaged 2.7%
between 1997 and 2006, lower than in any other English
speaking country.
? Gold sales: Between 1999 and 2002 you sold 60% of the UK’s gold
reserves at $275 an ounce, close to a 20-year low, a disastrous foray into
international asset management.
? Your spectrum auctions gathered £22.5 billion for the government
which caused a severe recession in the telecoms development industry
S T E V E N K A T I R A I
B E L L A M O U R , L O N G H O R S L E Y , M O R P E T H ,
N O R T H U M B E R L A N D N E 6 5 8 R B
e – m a i l – S t e v e n @ k a t i r a i . c o m
leading to the direct loss of 30,000 UK jobs. Two auctions were run in
the USA, the first being cancelled and re-run (for less revenue) due to
damage caused to the industry. The Americans realised their mistake
and tried to rectify it. The British and German chancellors copied the
North American first auction; which had failed. To copy a failed
economic model is normally considered a serious error of judgement.
? Your East Coast Mainline franchise auction led directly to the demise of
GNER, an excellent company, which was replaced by National Express
who offer East Coast mainline users a significantly poorer service. Your
duty was not only to maximise revenues, you also had a duty to the
shareholders, employees and customers which you completely failed.
? Anti-poverty: The Centre for Policy Studies found that the poorest fifth
of households, which accounted for 6.8% of all taxes in 1996–7,
accounted for 6.9% of all taxes paid in 2004-5. Meanwhile, their share
of state benefit payouts dropped from 28.1% to 27.1% over the same
period.
? Tax: According to the OECD UK taxation has increased from a 39.3%
share of gross domestic product in 1997 to 42.4% in 2006, going to a
higher level than Germany. This increase has mainly been attributed to
active government policy, and not simply to the growing economy.
? You pledged to not increase the basic or higher rates of income tax
however in all but your final budget, you only increased the tax
thresholds in line with inflation, rather than earnings, resulting in fiscal
drag.
? You abolished the 10% tax band so that you could reduce the basic rate
from 22% to 20%, to make it look like you were decreasing taxes.
However in fact it led to increased tax for 5 million people, and, left
those earning under £18,000 as the biggest losers.
? Pensions: Your changes in 1997 in the way corporation tax is collected,
directly led to the taxation of dividends on stock investments held
within pensions, thus lowering pension returns and contributing to the
demise of most of the final salary pension funds in the UK.
S T E V E N K A T I R A I
B E L L A M O U R , L O N G H O R S L E Y , M O R P E T H ,
N O R T H U M B E R L A N D N E 6 5 8 R B
e – m a i l – S t e v e n @ k a t i r a i . c o m
? This act alone has single handedly damaged the pension of every
person with a pension in the UK but also saddled UK corporations with
a an ever growing pension liability, so much so that many companies
futures are imperilled by these debts.
? Falsehoods: You used the Laura Spence Affair to beat up Oxford and
Cambridge about their admissions procedures, Lord Jenkins, then
Oxford Chancellor and himself a former Labour Chancellor of the
Exchequer, said “nearly every fact you used was false.
? Inappropriate links: Given the finding that the government did not
carry a proper public consultation on the use of nuclear power in its
2006 Energy Review, your brother Andrew’s is links to one of the main
nuclear lobbyists, EDF Energy could be construed as inappropriate.
? The father-in-law of your closest adviser Ed Balls, Tony Cooper (father
of the Labour minister Yvette Cooper) has close links with the nuclear
industry. Cooper was described as an “articulate, persuasive and wellinformed
advocate of nuclear power over the last ten years” by the
Nuclear Industry Association on his appointment as Chairman of the
British Nuclear Industry Forum in June 2002.
? IraqWar: You supported British involvement in the Iraq War against the
wishes of the UK population and helped to justify that involvement by
publishing false intelligence. This war has directly increased the odds of
terrorist attacks on British subjects and the financial cost has had a
significantly detrimental effect on the British economy.
? Military Covenant: You have not adhered to the ‘military covenant’,
leading to a significant decline in the moral of the armed forces due to
poor housing, lack of equipment and adequate healthcare provisions.
The lack of equipment has directly led to an increase in the loss of lives,
and serious injuries, compounded by a lack care following serious
injury.
? The 15% VAT Rate: introduced to counter the effects of recession
demonstrated a total naivety and breathtaking stupidity. Far from
digging the nation out of a hole, it has saddled the country with a huge
unsustainable debt.
S T E V E N K A T I R A I
B E L L A M O U R , L O N G H O R S L E Y , M O R P E T H ,
N O R T H U M B E R L A N D N E 6 5 8 R B
e – m a i l – S t e v e n @ k a t i r a i . c o m
? No one should benefit from failure: You have on numerous occasions
stated that no one should benefit from failure, however your tenure as
chancellor was universally recognised as a failure, but you were
rewarded with the Premiership and had the gall to accept.
? There will be no more Boom & Bust: In your hubris you made a
statement that was patently untrue, and counter to any economic
theory. You either knew that statement to be untrue and lied or if you
believed it then you clearly demonstrated your foolishness and proved
that you were unfit for office.
? The UK is in a better position than any other developed country: this
again is completely untrue, we have more than double the debt per
head of population than any other country in Europe.
? Public Services: You have destroyed Public Services by a raft of
inappropriate targets, which have led to resources being wasted by the
attempts to meet those targets.
? Surveillance society: You have presided over and led to the creation of
a surveillance society in which any perceived wrongdoing is used as a
pretext to pass oppressive laws. You and your predecessor have both
single headedly succeeded in making the UK an unpleasant place to live
in.
These are but a small sample of your failings any of which make you unfit
for public office and for which you should immediately resign. You sir are a
fraud and I am forwarding this letter to as many people as I can, via the
internet in an effort to shame you into accepting your failures.
Yours faithfully
Steven Katirai

How stupid can train companies get?

Wednesday, September 24th, 2008
share save 256 24 How stupid can train companies get?

As of 1st October 2008, only dogs weighing 6kg and less will be able to travel (caged) by train in Italy. All others over 6kg will be banned from rail travel. In a move to tidy up their shitty, dirty trains some muppet had the idea that dogs make all the mess on trains, and it isn’t actually TrenItalia’s fault at all for not cleaning them.

As such on the 30th September, animal rights groups plan demonstrations of masses of dogs at all TrenItalia stations across Italy in a home to reverse the decision.

Sort your lives out TrenItalia – I travel with my dog on an almost fortnightly basis, paying for myself and my dog. If you implement this rule, I never will again. I will also dump all my dogs shit in and outside Porto Nouva station, just for you to clean up!

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Life Insurance Quote

Wednesday, July 30th, 2008
share save 256 24 Life Insurance Quote

If any private investigators, government officials etc or indeed decent people, need a Life Insurance Quote <<< CLICK HERE

Bad Behavior has blocked 1206 access attempts in the last 7 days.